In two of the competitions, the predictions made by the Data Science Machine came to be 96 percent and 94 percent correct and made it to winning submissions. However, in the third competition the result was at 87 percent. But the surprising thing to be noted is that the Data Science Machine took only two to twelve hours for analyzing the entries whereas the human teams took months to develop their prediction algorithms.
Max Kanter’s thesis in computer science has laid the foundation for this machine and states the researchers take this machine as a match to the human intelligence and there is lot of data to be analyzed. Kalyan Veeramachaneni, research scientist at MIT has worked on the thesis with Kanter. The paper will be presented at IEEE’s International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics.
Veeramachaneni is the co-leader at Anyscale Learning for All group, CSAIL where the machine learning techniques are applied to practical problems related to big-data analysis. He said “What the researchers have seen from their experience in resolving a number of data science problems for industry is that one of the very acute step is named feature engineering. The initial thing you have to do is recognize what variables to bring out from the database or compose, and for that, you need to come up with a lot of ideas.”
Image Source: thestandarddaily.com